I vote Nice Price

"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg) 01/09/2017 at 14:30 • Filed to: None

1

7

I saw this 1933 Duesenberg Model J with coachwork by Franay at the !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! over the summer, and I loved it. Apparently it sold at auction just four years ago for $1.65 million dollars. With that in mind, the current asking price of !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!! dollars seems extremely reasonable. I’ll take it, but put the thick white walls back on it first.

Matt Nichelson > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 01/09/2017 at 14:49

0

A classic like this deserves white wall tires. I think the asking price is definiyely reasonable given the market and the provenance of these cars. It does make you wonder why they are selling it at a loss that big, though. Cars like this are meant to be an investment.

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Matt Nichelson 01/09/2017 at 15:06

1

Yeah, I’m not sure. It’s not like the market has been going down. All I can say is that the dealer selling it now is not the same one that paid $1.65 million for it, so it’s not their loss.

Steve in Manhattan > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 01/09/2017 at 15:22

1

Might meet their price, but definitely want a PPI on something that old ...

sm70- why not Duesenberg? > Steve in Manhattan 01/09/2017 at 15:26

0

lol

RallyWrench > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 01/09/2017 at 15:31

1

Beautiful. There is going to be some serious value to be had in prewar American classics in coming years, most of their ownership demographic is aging and later generations mostly don’t value them the same. Good news for us.

Galileo Humpkins (aka MC Clap Yo Handz) > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 01/09/2017 at 16:21

1

I’d give it a NP up to $1.8M

Manwich - now Keto-Friendly > sm70- why not Duesenberg? 01/09/2017 at 17:28

1

I vote Crack Pipe because no USB ports!!!

/jk